Social media is more than Slacktivism. Social movements,
such as The Twitter Revolutions, (see Arab Spring, Tunisia, Moldova) are solid proofs that the capability of everyday people to
circulate information and opinion online, in real time, can mobilize public
opinion, and even overthrow political regimes. Hence, social media are extremely
powerful, especially because they bring something new on the scene of protest :
the peer-to-peer communication. This is perhaps the most important aspect about
social movements -- choosing to protest on social media, people bypass the doubtful
interests of mass-media, owned and controlled by a few people.
Accordingly, I do not agree with Robert Putnam, cited by
Christensen (2011) when he argues that “citizens are becoming ‘lonely bowlers’
who no longer interact socially, and as a consequence no longer willing to take
part in political matters “ (para. 8). He then argues that “the media —
particularly TV but also the Internet — have helped decrease stocks of social
capital, and thereby also the willingness among citizens to engage in political
activities” (Putnam, cited by Christensen, 2011 para. 8). He is wrong. Twitter
Revolutions indicate the contrary. Furthermore, as mentioned, it is a big difference
between social media and mass-media due to the peer-to-peer communication brought
by the latter; moreover, if before one may have been a ‘lonely bowler’ watching
TV, now he can easily find like-minded people on social media, and set up a
Twitter Revolution.
By the same token, it is not relevant that studies
have found that“[o]n Twitter, political talk is highly partisan, where users’
clusters are characterized by homogeneous views and are linked to information
sources” (Wihbey, 2013). It is not relevant because political talk is not
supposed to be objective. It never was. It is supposed to bring forward debates
based on ideas that will eventually improve the community’s life as a whole.
References
Christensen, H. (2011). Political activities on the
Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means?. First
Monday, 16(2). Retrieved from
http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3336/2767
Wihbey, J. (2013). Pew Research: Twitter reaction to events often at odds with overall public opinion. Journalist's Resource. Retrieved 9 March 2015, from http://journalistsresource.org/studies/politics/digital-democracy/pew-research-twitter-reaction-events-odds-overall-public-opinion#sthash.ws7YuaIG.dpuf
Good post Adela.
ReplyDeleteThanks Adela. You might be interested in this survey that asked people whether social media is useful in generating political action - 100% of respondents said yes: http://www.debate.org/opinions/is-social-media-useful-in-generating-political-and-social-action
ReplyDeleteSorry to be childish here, Adela, but maybe Putnam's jealous he hadn't thought of it first. Or maybe he feels threatened by what he sees as an infringement on his territory! In either case, you're dead on here. Good on ya.
ReplyDelete